The Privilege of Self-Denial
Among ancients the greatest honor was given to those who,
seeing the greater good of the greater number, chose valiantly to deny
themselves certain rights and pleasures in order improve those around them. But
somewhere along the line of history, the honorable virtue of self-denial became
associated with weakness, as in not "looking out for #1" and
"pulling one's own strings." In fact, it became commonplace to
believe that only fools knowingly denied themselves something in order to
create something better for others. Nice guys finish last, and we would much
rather win than be nice. Only chumps allowed themselves to be taken advantage
of, or willingly gave up something in order to better someone else.
But the fact that it is not highly appreciated in no way
means that self-denial has lost its value in society. We still see it, and
sometimes it is even applauded, but for the most part, it has ceased to be included
in the list of virtues we consider essential and attempt to pass on to our
children. We also see the consequences of a "me first and foremost:
mindset in our world.
It used to be that only children were allowed to be
self-centered. It was their natural bent, and the role of the parent was to
banish such foolishness before the child was allowed out into civil society.
This was done by increasingly saying "no" to the child's desire for
his or her every wish to be fulfilled ... immediately. Over time children
learned something we used to call "delayed gratification." This was
the virtue of waiting to get your way, which necessitated saying "no"
to your own desires. In simple terms, this was taking control over personal
desires and denying them their way. Self-denial - the inner ability to say
"no" to self - was considered an essential component of maturity.
And herein lies the stark reality: our society is
increasingly being pulled into the vortex of selfishness because the childish
propensity to pamper, indulge, and satiate self has been turned into the virtue
of freedom, self-expression and most of all, the crown jewel of modern ethics,
high self-esteem. Our goal, apparently, is to feel good about ourselves, and
anything that might bring sadness or suffering must never be allowed to find
place in our lives. Chief among the things we've had to jettison in our quest
for ever greater levels of self-love is self-denial. If you love yourself, then
it only follows that it is your duty to fulfill your desires as often and as
completely as possible, regardless of how this worldview affects those around
you.
Despite the huge success of the self-esteem movement, and it
attendant ruinous consequences, we do still see the value of self-denial in
isolated areas. The military has long considered it essential to rid their
recruits of the entitlement gene, and the rigors of basic training do just
that. The academies that shape our law enforcement and fire professionals also
consider self-denial to be an essential character trait in their men and women,
and work hard to build this control into them. Even the sports world at times
recognizes that when Kobe Bryant denies his primary desire - to shoot the
basketball - and instead passes the ball to his teammates, the team wins more
games.
What the military, law enforcement, fire, and some
enlightened sports fans understand is that the ability to overcome the biggest
challenges in life begins with the ability to overcome the tyrant of self.
Those who can face down their own desires, making the self their slave rather
than their master, are more apt to stay away from addicting habits, more
capable of staying faithful to their commitments in the face of temptations to
the contrary, and more ready to act courageously in times when the welfare of
others threatens the serenity of self.
Jesus put it this way: "If anyone wishes to come after
me, he must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me." In order to follow the master, we have
to resign the mastery of our lives. And, while on the surface this looks like
losing, it is really the best option. The selfish life has never created an
authentic sense of purpose, satisfaction, or accomplishment. History books are
full of men and women who have lived their lives for themselves only to realize
too late that they were devoid of personal value and satisfaction. Ultimately,
the self-satiated life is not worth living, and we can only hope our world
catches on soon.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home